+1 for parking it.
your right it would force action.

=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation 
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>

Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist

Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>


David E Jones sent the following on 4/21/2010 11:02 AM:
> Shi,
> 
> I'm the one who started this discussion. My intention so far has been to try 
> to encourage some action on this issue. So far, that has failed (lots of 
> talk, no action).
> 
> If I kept ofbiz.org I'm not sure what I'd even do with it, and I'd rather 
> have the ASF take it over.
> 
> Still, after the responses so far keeping it for my own isn't a bad idea... 
> and becoming more tempting. Most likely though I'll just play the Hotwax game 
> and hold on to it but change the DNS server and park it to encourage action.
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Shi Yusen wrote:
> 
>> I think David should keep ofbiz.org as his own. Community is not
>> communist.
>>
>> Please stop this discussion.
>>
>>
>> 在 2010-04-21三的 11:46 -0600,Tim Ruppert写道:
>>> Here's the latest update from Infra at the ASF:
>>>
>>> 1. They will be happy to migrate the ofbiz.org domain.
>>> 2. They have recommended that we not transfer it to them right away
>>> - But instead either reup it where it is or migrate it to someone who can 
>>> manage it
>>> 3. The reason is that it will take a while for them to migrate all of the 
>>> services :(
>>> - This will be important IMO.
>>> - The services that would be migrated would be:
>>> -- DNS
>>> -- Apache redirects
>>> 4. Getting services in place before we move to the ASF.
>>> - I think this is important because due to propagation, we would have 
>>> everything already setup.
>>> - This will lead to less headaches.
>>>
>>> Because David does not want to be in the middle of this, my vote would 
>>> still be to transfer the domain to someone like Jacopo since he's the PMC 
>>> chair.  He gets the domain reup at really cheap prices, he has access to 
>>> keep the services exactly as they are today and can get the information to 
>>> the ASF, and there's no chance that he'd do something devious with the 
>>> domain.  
>>>
>>> David, if you are interested in this, please think about it and let us all 
>>> know - this will ensure that services do not go down for anyone involved - 
>>> and Jacopo can manage migrating it to the ASF once the DNS and apache host 
>>> files are already in place.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ruppert
>>>
>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 17, 2010, at 7:05 AM, David E Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wow, this discussion has really taken on a life of its own.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I wasn't clear enough before... the $35 or somehow saving me some 
>>>>> effort in continuing to do things the old way is not the point, the point 
>>>>> is to get this onto ASF infra ASAP just like all other resources. It 
>>>>> would be way easier to click a few buttons but that wouldn't resolve the 
>>>>> issue with ofbiz.org that some individual owns the domain and that the 
>>>>> DNS is still hosted by a third party (ie Contegix).
>>>>>
>>>> Yes this makes a lot of sense to me; let's see if the Infra can take 
>>>> action quickly (the ball is already in their court) and if not let's find 
>>>> another good solution together.
>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand, the whole auctioning idea for the domain name is 
>>>>> interesting... do I hear $1000? One thousand to the respectable lady in 
>>>>> front. Do I hear $1500? Fifteen hundred to the gentleman in the t-shirt 
>>>>> and shorts. Let's get this really going! Do I hear $5000? Amazing folks! 
>>>>> Five thousand to the man in the suit with the hat with red lettering on 
>>>>> it that I can't quite make out from here... looks like it starts with an 
>>>>> "O" and is in all caps. Going once... going twice... sold! A special 
>>>>> thanks to all involved, and to the man who... wait... wow again! I've 
>>>>> just been informed that ofbiz.org and sun.com are now under the same 
>>>>> umbrella... who could have imagined!  ;)
>>>> This is really great!
>>>> BTW thank you David for bringing up this important topic.
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The only thing that's less low effort is that this keeps David having to 
>>>>>> mess with it - which is what I'm hoping to avoid.  As I said before - it 
>>>>>> doesn't matter to me - this is just a super cheap way of doing things 
>>>>>> and puts the onus on the people who want to follow this one all the way 
>>>>>> thru.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The good thing - is regardless of which way David decides to go - I 
>>>>>> think we'll be able to support making it happen relatively quickly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>>>>>> I guess I'd love to know why you're looking to pay $70+ for an interim 
>>>>>>>> solution when I can get do it for the community for just a few bucks 
>>>>>>>> and I'll likely be the one to help ensure that it actually gets pushed 
>>>>>>>> forward and maintained?  Doesn't matter much to me, sounds like David 
>>>>>>>> should just put it up for auction - there seem to be a lot of people 
>>>>>>>> looking to spend money on it ....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just figured David has been paying for it for some time and could use
>>>>>>> a little reimbursement for his troubles. I agree with you that Network
>>>>>>> Solutions prices are highway robbery. OpenSRS (TUCOWS) is cheaper as is
>>>>>>> GoDaddy or a bunch of others but they all require some immediate effort.
>>>>>>> I figured paying the $35 is the lowest effort way for David to keep the
>>>>>>> domain secure until ASF-infra is ready to do something about it. He'd
>>>>>>> get reimbursed and then some for his effort with my scheme.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I do share your dislike for Network Solutions but what's $35 more bucks
>>>>>>> in the larger picture?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Ean Schuessler, CTO
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> 214-720-0700 x 315
>>>>>>> Brainfood, Inc.
>>>>>>> http://www.brainfood.com
>>>>>>>
> 
> 


Reply via email to