Jacques Le Roux wrote: > From: "james_sg" <snowme...@hotmail.com> >> +1 >> >> For 2), may I suggest that the new run-install should print out a list of >> run-install-* variants and their explanations? > > There is already the traditionnal ant -p for all targets, but yes, why > not...
Sorry, that brings us back to the start of this. Changing what run-install does is what I thought we decided against. It can print suggestions/warnings, but it should still process whatever cmdline args just like it always has.
