+1 on backporting tests - especially under the guise of stability. Cheers, Ruppert
On May 1, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Anil Patel wrote: > Keep asking, If there are enough reason, we may come up with some policy that > allows for it. > > Or > may be we create one more release branch as soon as in next two months and > kill this branch in its alpha stage itself. > > Thanks and Regards > Anil Patel > HotWax Media Inc > Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" > > On May 1, 2010, at 5:16 AM, chris snow wrote: > >> It would be good if we could backport the field tooltip messages too. >> >> Many thanks, chris >> >> On 1 May 2010 09:59, "Vikas Mayur" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Jacopo for all of your hard work to make it happen. >> >> Btw I am not sure if this is a good question to you (and others of course) >> about commit policy to the release branch. >> >> We all know that the main idea behind the release branch is to provide a >> more stable version of OFBiz. >> >> I was just wondering if we could also change the commit policy to back port >> unit test besides bug fixes. >> >> This way there would be more code coverage with the additional unit tests >> resulted by backporting to the release branch. >> >> I am sorry if this has been already discussed in past. >> >> Regards >> Vikas >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ... >
