Bruno Busco wrote: > > 2010/5/2 Scott Gray <[email protected]> > >> To me extend seems clear but I agree it does conflict with the way that >> term is used elsewhere in the framework. I don't really like merge >> though, >> it doesn't feel like an accurate description of what is happening. Any >> other ideas anyone? >> > > What about "overrides" ? >
When i first read of the feature I felt "override" was appropriate because the original use case was defined in terms of overriding a view-map entry. But (without looking at the implementation) I think you could use this as an extension as well ... for example, you could likely provide a new view-handler (extension) to go along with an override view-map, and that newly rendered form could postback to a new request-map (extension). So I understand why Scott felt "extend" was the right term ... I wonder if this is really just external modification to a controller. Terms that felt kinda close were stuff like application, external-definition, enhance ... perhaps something in that ballpark could be used to define exactly what is happening here ? -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Controller-Injection-tp2076418p2123369.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
