Do we need any formal vote procedure to conclude whether we should backport unit test or not?
Regards Vikas On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < [email protected]> wrote: > This looks like a good idea to me and I don't see why we should not allow > to backport automated tests. > > Jacopo > > On May 1, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote: > > > Thanks Jacopo for all of your hard work to make it happen. > > > > Btw I am not sure if this is a good question to you (and others of > course) > > about commit policy to the release branch. > > > > We all know that the main idea behind the release branch is to provide a > > more stable version of OFBiz. > > > > I was just wondering if we could also change the commit policy to back > port > > unit test besides bug fixes. > > > > This way there would be more code coverage with the additional unit tests > > resulted by backporting to the release branch. > > > > I am sorry if this has been already discussed in past. > > > > Regards > > Vikas > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> The new release branch "10.04" is now available here: > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/release10.04 > >> > >> Checkout instructions are, as usual, here: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access > >> > >> There is now a new version "Release Branch 10.04" in Jira that can be > used > >> to mark Jira tickets that contain patches (or bug reports) specifically > >> addressed to this branch. > >> > >> We will only accept bug fixes for this branch and we will issue official > >> releases over time (tentatively every quarter). > >> > >> To the whole community: please help to stabilize the branch with tests, > bug > >> reports and fixes; the quality of the upcoming releases in the 10.04 > series > >> will be determined by the activity and contribution of the community. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >> > >
