On 4/05/2010, at 4:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Adrian Crum <[email protected]> wrote: >> --- On Mon, 5/3/10, Scott Gray <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 4/05/2010, at 11:32 AM, Adrian >>> Crum wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/3/2010 4:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>>> Sometimes I think using the same schema and >> class >>> for single forms and list forms holds us back from >>> implementing features specific to one or the other and >> even >>> when we do it results in a messy schema. >>>>> >>>>> What if we were to separate the two but have >> them >>> share a common base? We could start by separating >> the >>> schemas and then work on the code. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Any effort to clean up and improve widget code >> gets a >>> big thumbs-up from me. >>>> >>>> While we're at it, could we separate the styling >> into >>> a separate element and Java class? Chris Howe had >> suggested >>> that some years ago. >>> >>> I'm not entirely sure what you mean on this one? >>> Could you give me an example of what the problem is >> and how >>> this would solve it? >> >> I think it was around the beginning of 2007. The idea was >> to move all of the form widget styling attributes to a style >> element - to cut down on the amount of form attributes. We >> made a preliminary move in that direction by putting all of >> the form styling attributes on their own line - so that >> later they could be contained in a separate element. > > I can't find the ml discussion, but here is the related Jira issue: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-760 > > -Adrian
Okay thanks, I see what you mean now. I'll stew on it for a bit and see what I can add to the discussion. Regards Scott
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
