+1 for JQuery, it might be pain to learn newer tech, but as we recently start looking into it, we found It has much more easy ways to handle things.
Rishi Solanki Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Deepak Dixit <deepak.di...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote: > Good idea Sascha, > > Yes jQuery is much better then Dojo and much faster then Prototype. > > > Thanks & Regards > -- > Deepak Dixit > HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. > > > > > Sascha Rodekamp wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> i started the work to update the Dojo libary to the current version 1.4. >> And i have to say that it didn't satisfy me to work on every Dojo based >> JaveScript for a little version update. It will coast a lot of time to >> test >> and update all the JavaScript Code. And what we have at the end a new >> heavy >> Dojo libary which brings a lot of widget but it's hard to extend :-) >> >> So i have another (maybe better idea). Why we didn't set Dojo and >> Prototype >> as depricated >> and starting to use jQuerry. In my optinion jQuerry is a better invest in >> the future. There are a lot of Widget/ Plugin's too and it's much lighter >> than Dojo. >> >> Instead of spending my time with updating all the Dojo stuff, i could >> spend >> my time to migrate all Prototype / Dojo based Code to jQuerry. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Cheers >> Sascha >> >> 2010/6/5 Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> >> >> >> >>> Looks like good plan. Overtime people might choose to replace prototype >>> framework with similar thing from Dojo. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> Anil Patel >>> HotWax Media Inc >>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" >>> >>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> So far I have mostly used Dojo for its tree in a CMS tool, and some >>>> >>>> >>> Prototype functions notably for layered lookups. >>> >>> >>>> I still see them as complementary (Dojo coming more complete but >>>> heavier, >>>> >>>> >>> Prototype being mostly an API). >>> >>> >>>> I does do think it's necessary to make a choice. >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@yahoo.com> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >From what I recall, the two libraries were included in the project >>>>> with >>>>> >>>>> >>>> the idea that the most popular one would get used. At the >>> >>> >>>> time, Dojo was a very heavy library and the first attempts to use it >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> resulted in very slow page loads. I used Prototype in some >>> >>> >>>> initial Ajax work - mainly because it was pretty easy to use. Today, I >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> have no preference for either one. >>> >>> >>>> -Adrian >>>>> >>>>> --- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> From: Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4 >>>>>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org >>>>>> Cc: "Anil Patel" <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>>>>> Date: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 7:00 AM >>>>>> I started using Dojo in Ofbiz long >>>>>> back and in six months because of issues faced we switched >>>>>> to using prototype. At that time there were few others in >>>>>> comunity who liked prototype better. But I really don't >>>>>> remember the reasons. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since then new checkout process was added that uses >>>>>> prototype for all javascript needs. But did not remove Dojo >>>>>> because i did not want to upset anybody in community. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>>> Anil Patel >>>>>> HotWax Media Inc >>>>>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword >>>>>> "ofbiz" >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I have created a branch >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/dojo1.4 >>>>>>> Nothing else for now >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Sascha Rodekamp" <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Jacques ... >>>>>>>> jep it's a lot of work but not impossible :) >>>>>>>> A brunch is a good idea to start working on this >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> project. I think the reason >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> for Antil was, that he isn't use to Dojo. But that >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> shouldn't be a problem >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> the syntax isn't complicated. >>>>>>>> And by the way, if this will work the new Dojo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> will bring us a big benefit >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> (in my opinion). >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> Sascha >>>>>>>> 2010/6/5 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sascha, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We should rather use the dev ML for this >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thread. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe it's the reason why Anil was reluctant >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to use Dojo? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sascha Rodekamp wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so i started upgrading to dojo 1.4. >>>>>>>>>>> The good point is ... Dojo 1.4 has >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> many really cool new Features which >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>> help us to improve the UI. >>>>>>>>>>> The Bad thing is, some parts of the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> syntax had changed. That effects many >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> parts in OFBiz (OnePageCheckout, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Trees, all Dojo features Scripts :-)). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Arg, I did not thought it will be so much >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> trouble :/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> So that's a lot of work and i can't do it >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> on my own ... who volunteer to >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> help me ;) ?? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I could help >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> First Step is to collect all depending >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> issues and than to fix them step >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>> step. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So if we do that we need a branch I >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> guess... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sascha >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >> http://www.lynx.de >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >
