Le 26/08/2010 10:19, Scott Gray a écrit :
Hi Erwan,
Why the unnecessary changes? All that was needed to change was fix the ConditionObject
constructor. It should have been checking for "field" and then falling back to
"field-name" (for backwards compatibility reasons), there was no need to change the
schemas and I think the previous attribute name was more consistent.
And I definitely don't agree with backporting unnecessary schema changes to
10.04.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Scott,
no problem for reverting on the 10.04, it's on its way. But for trunk, I
really think the new names are more consistent than the previous ones.
Once again, if this is not ok with you, then I will look at another way
to make this work.
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
