Could we use perhaps some <xs:pattern ? 2010/12/14 Erwan de FERRIERES <[email protected]>
> Le 14/12/2010 09:35, Scott Gray a écrit : > > On 14/12/2010, at 9:16 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >> >> Le 14/12/2010 07:37, Bruno Busco a écrit : >>> >>>> A variable name as enumeration value? >>>> Sorry but I have never seen this pattern. >>>> What's different in conf-mode and use-private from all other expandable >>>> boolean attributes? >>>> >>>> -Bruno >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Bruno and Scott, >>> >>> Ok, this was not pretty. Those variables were introduced at this rev, >>> could you tell me how to handle it in the DTD ? >>> >>> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/ofbiz/?cs=1023286 >>> >>> >> We have this pattern in a few places so I don't have a problem with that, >> it's just the parameters map prefix that I hadn't seen before. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> So, just a revert will be the solution ? My point was just that > validation wasn't done because of those parameters. maybe there is something > else we can do ? > > > -- > Erwan de FERRIERES > www.nereide.biz >
