I really think you'd need to split the content component into two, simply moving it to the framework would probably introduce a whole other set of dependencies to deal with.
Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/12/2010, at 7:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > To clarify, I'm trying to get the components in the framework folder to run > by themselves - without the components found in the applications folder. Some > of the framework components have UIs. > > I understand everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes a > framework, so I don't want to rehash that discussion. I just want to disable > the components in the applications folder and still have OFBiz run. > > -Adrian > > On 12/15/2010 10:13 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: >> first question is should there be any UI activity at the framework level. >> Should not it just be the support to allow a UI system to put installed. >> when I mean UI I am talking about any interaction to the user. >> >> ========================= >> BJ Freeman >> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >> <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >> >> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >> >> >> Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/15/2010 9:52 AM: >>> I'm working on a project that requires only the OFBiz framework. I'm >>> trying to get a framework-only installation to run. >>> >>> There are a lot of dependencies on the party and content components. >>> Removing dependencies on the party component should be fairly easy. The >>> online help system uses the content component, so that is an issue. >>> Should we move the content component to the framework? >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
