IMHO, follow the general version convention should be better, such as
10.0,10.1,10.5, 11.0 ....
Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
Thanks & Best Regards .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Young Gu | Software Engineer | http://www.infor.com
On 1/5/2011 3:18 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi All,
+1 on the new release.
But I propose to reconsider a name change as 10.04 (as in 2010, month 04) is
already long gone.
Regards,
Pierre
2011/1/4 Young Gu<[email protected]>
Seems the branch 10.04 is available, but the download page is still 09.04,
how about the 10.04? Is the code freezing now?
Please be free to contact with me for any question or suggestion.
Thanks& Best Regards,
Young Gu | Software Engineer | www.infor.com
On 01/04/2011 10:38 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Are we ready to discuss about this now?
Jacopo
On Dec 16, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 12/16/2010 03:17 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is not a formal vote yet.
Are there any reasons for not starting a vote for the official release
of Apache OFBiz 10.04?
If there are concerns that the 10.04 branch is still not stable enough,
we could release as "Apache OFBiz 10.04RC1" but at this point I think it
will be fine to release it as "Apache OFBiz 10.04", in order to consider it
our latest stable release. Bug fixes will then be released in future bug fix
releases (e.g. "Apache OFBiz 10.04.01", "Apache OFBiz 10.04.02"...).
I would like to start a voting thread before the end of the week, so
please speak up if you feel we should not do this.
I would like to postpone the whole thing until the start of the new year.
This is the christmas holidays, and some people don't have spare time to
think about this.
