One thing that is important to remember is that there is a difference between real obstacles to innovation and imagined ones.

David expressed frustration with the inability to innovate due to push back from a few people who insist on backward compatibility. That is a real obstacle. I am hopeful my appeal to compromise will help us get past that one.

He is also nostalgic about the "good old days" when a handful of committers were free to make any changes they wanted with little or no discussion, or any consideration of the impact those changes would have on the user base. He sees discussion, planning, and finding a consensus as an obstacle to innovation. That obstacle is imagined.

Like I said in a previous reply, there is nothing prohibiting David from innovating in OFBiz - his ideas have been discussed before and we all seemed to agree that they would be good things to do.

David's decision to give up on participating in this community has nothing to do with a failure on the PMCs part.

-Adrian

Quoting Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>:
The primary goal of the PMC, and the community in general, should be that of creating the perfect environment to facilitate contributions from people like David, and limit/review/improve the contributions from other less blessed contributors: it seems like all our efforts are obtaining the exact opposite result.


Reply via email to