The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request Role Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name difference, the only other difference is using Role Type instead of Request Role Type. Reusing Role Type in this way is okay from my perspective. The problem is, the CustRequestParty entity isn't related to Role Type, instead it is related to PartyRole - which requires a PartyRole entry.

That is an extremely limiting relationship - a party can't be related to a Request in a particular role unless they are already a member of that role.

I would like to change that relationship from PartyRole to RoleType. Any thoughts?

-Adrian

Reply via email to