The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request
Role Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name
difference, the only other difference is using Role Type instead of
Request Role Type. Reusing Role Type in this way is okay from my
perspective. The problem is, the CustRequestParty entity isn't related
to Role Type, instead it is related to PartyRole - which requires a
PartyRole entry.
That is an extremely limiting relationship - a party can't be related to
a Request in a particular role unless they are already a member of that
role.
I would like to change that relationship from PartyRole to RoleType. Any
thoughts?
-Adrian
- CustRequestParty entity Adrian Crum
-