I an not sure the logic you are trying to make me aware of or how it relates to what I am talking about. when an entity-and is done foristance, you define the map that will be stored in which would be say phase. That agree on. however phase.fieldname should be the entity field name. I can trace easliy were the map name is generated but when I have a something like taskID instead of workeffortID I have to look further to see how taskID was created since it is not part of the entity.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 7/9/2011 6:17 PM: > BJ, > > naming of project and also scrum entities is already required on the > view level...there are views where the workeffort is already included > three times, as project, phase and task..... > > Regards, > Hans > > On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 13:39 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote: >> sorry if I was not clear. >> from a developers point of view and the original premise of ofbiz naming >> was to have them reflect the entities they used. >> once you got to the UI level then Naming the user saw, could be changed >> to a more user friendly text. >> >> >> Erwan de FERRIERES sent the following on 7/9/2011 1:13 PM: >>> Le 03/07/2011 07:44, BJ Freeman a écrit : >>>> I am confused. there is no fields about projects, only workeffort >>>> parentProjectId =parentWorkeffortId with a workEffortTypeId ="PROJECT" >>> >>> Hi BJ, >>> >>> take a look to ProjectScreens.xml#ProjectView, you'll find all you need >>> there. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >
