I did some brief looking on their site and they are definitely deprecated to their new ones. I'd deprecate it and then remove it before the next release - just to be safe.
Cheers, Ruppert On Aug 10, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi BIlgin, > > But from what Tim said, it's not deprecated, it's unusable... > > Jacques > > From: "Bilgin Ibryam" <[email protected]> >> I'd suggest we mark it as @Deprecated and remove after some time. >> Bilgin >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Then indeed we could consider to remove it. If anybody really need it s/he >>> could still find it in one of the releases... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> They changed their name and rebuilt all of the web services a few years >>>> ago. That being said, I have no idea if anyone is using it any longer - but >>>> it stopped working for us a while back so we stopped using it. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Ruppert >>>> >>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:41 PM, David E Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> We have a general precedence for not removing things people might be >>>>> using, which is anything in the project, especially without reasonable >>>>> notice (like waiting a while for comment). >>>>> >>>>> On the other hand, if the company behind these services no longer existed >>>>> or something like that (I don't know if this is the case), then yes might >>>>> as >>>>> well remove them right away. >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Everybody agree? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a likely out of date old web services API - my guess is we could >>>>>>> drop it all together. >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Ruppert >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Tim Ruppert >>>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>>> o:801.649.6594 >>>>>>> f:801.649.6595 >>>>>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> I really wonder if CdyneServices.java should be in commons or rather >>>>>>>> in commonext. It looks like an application util to me. >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
