On 08/16/2011 06:12 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > I've always thought the ofbiz-containers.xml approach was too > simplistic, and a duplication of existing functionality. From my > perspective, it would be better if ofbiz-containers.xml simply specified > the container class, and it should have only one property - a pointer to > the folder where the container's configuration files are found.
s/simplistic/complex/. But yes, your suggestion gives me an idea of how to implement this more correctly.
