[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13155217#comment-13155217
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-4572:
-------------------------------------------
Hi Adrian,
no, I haven't.
Reading from here, http://xstream.codehaus.org/json-tutorial.html, it seems
that xstream is more oriented XML, and not pure JSON, or we need to use the
jettison interface.
> Migration from json-lib to jackson
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-4572
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4572
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: framework
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Erwan de FERRIERES
> Priority: Minor
>
> According to various benchmarks, json-lib, based on the json.org
> implementation, is one of the slowest implementation for json parsing.
> Moreover, this project hasn't been updated since 2010-12-14 (latest release),
> and activity on the user mailing-list is empty.
> I found jackson, which seems to be a lot faster, and activity is bigger, with
> a lot of releases (next to monthly).
> Here are some links:
> benchmark: https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki/
> Update on State of Json-parsing Performance:
> http://www.cowtowncoder.com/blog/archives/2009/02/entry_204.html
> Upgrade from org.json to Jackson, piece by piece, using
> jackson-module-org-json:
> http://www.cowtowncoder.com/blog/archives/2011/03/entry_447.html
> project's documentation: http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonDocumentation
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
