From: "Pierre Smits" <[email protected]>
Maybe loss of common sense and growth of rigidness of convictions gets in
your way. I don't know....
Adam explained why, see his comment in the other thread
As one wants to have the test ports stay the same as production ports, so
that a specific group of end-users (namely developers and testers) can NOT
do testing in a CI way. Merely because it's a release. Because the new port
numbers might be in use.... And the old port numbers (read production port
numbers) are expected to be not?
We did in trunk, people which are using release can do that in a snap if they
need it.
I don't see any reasons to arg here and go agains the rule: *if it's not broken
don't fix it*
And saying: I wont deliver to JIRA, because that is NOT my way. So the
community can't test before code gets into the stream. Even when it is
asked for by the community....
This is Adam, not me. I must say the way Adam works (svn commit bursts) is not
perfect.
That's the problem with Git users. See other threads in ASF as well...
I could call that being stupid... It's surely not helping the product and
this community along.
As is stated in ASF regulations and guidelines AND established in other
threads on this ML: End users should not have access development code or
test functionality in releases. For that there are other means (read SVN).
But hey, developers and testers are end users too. So treating all in the
same manner might be acceptible, when you're not thinking things through.
Or as another stated: having a fix for missing help screens is not bug
fixing, but improving the release (to paraphrase) and is therefore not
going to be implemented in a release.
That was me. As is said this (and other moot cases) can be discussed with the
community.
If we find a consensus I'm personnaly not against it. This has already been
done in the past...
DURA LEX, SED LEX
Jacques
> Maybe you should ask yourself why you got involved in this project, this
community and why you were asked to join either the PMC or the group of
committers and whether you are still adhering to those principles or
guidelines. From the outside (meaning not being a PMC or a committer, but
being part of this community) it often seems like your not.
If you still feel you are then stay in touch with the community. If not,
please state so and .....
Regards,
Pierre
Op 21 april 2012 09:35 schreef Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]
het volgende:
Please Erwan revert: this is not a bug and should not be backported,
unless there is a consensus in the community.
Thanks
Jacques
Author: erwan
Date: Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
New Revision: 1328518
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1328518&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328518&view=rev>
Log:
OFBIZ-4827 Release branch doesn't test in Jenkins
Modified:
ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
containers.xml
Modified: ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**
containers.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**
framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=**
1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/branches/release11.04/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1328518&r1=1328517&r2=1328518&view=diff>
==============================**==============================**
==================
--- ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
(original)
+++ ofbiz/branches/release11.04/**framework/base/config/test-**containers.xml
Fri Apr 20 21:35:38 2012
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License.
<!-- load the naming (JNDI) server -->
<container name="naming-container" class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.*
*NamingServiceContainer">
- <property name="port" value="1099"/>
+ <property name="port" value="1100"/>
</container>
<!-- RMI Service Dispatcher -->
<container name="rmi-dispatcher" class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
RmiServiceContainer">
<property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/>
<property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/>
- <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/>
+ <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/>
<property name="delegator-name" value="test"/>
<property name="client-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/>
<property name="server-factory" value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**
socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/>
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ under the License.
<property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/>
<property name="maxThreads" value="200"/>
<property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
- <property name="port" value="8009"/>
+ <property name="port" value="8010"/>
<property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/>
<property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/>
<property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/>
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ under the License.
<property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
<property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
<property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
- <property name="port" value="8080"/>
+ <property name="port" value="8081"/>
<property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
<property name="server" value=""/>
<property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ under the License.
<property name="maxThreads" value="100"/>
<property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/>
<property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/>
- <property name="port" value="8443"/>
+ <property name="port" value="8444"/>
<property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/>
<property name="server" value=""/>
<property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/>
