To keep the release cycle simple and understandable, I think we should go with the first option.
Regards Vikas On Apr 24, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is just an early notice that we have 1 week before the end of April; if > we want to continue with the YY.04 pattern, and create a 12.04 branch, it > would be nice to cut the release sometime during this week. > This thread is intended to help the synchronization between committers; > possible options: > > 1) create the branch sometime before the end of April with name "release12.04" > 2) delay a little bit (a few weeks?) the creation of the branch, that we will > still name "release12.04" > 3) delay the creation of the branch and then we will call it 12.MM where MM > is the month of the creation of it > > My preference would be #1; please express your preference and I will > implement accordingly. > > Kind regards, > > Jacopo
