On 05/14/2012 02:49 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 02:43 PM, adri...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: adrianc
>> Date: Mon May 14 19:43:18 2012
>> New Revision: 1338361
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1338361&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Added a utility method to FlexibleMapAccessor.java to test for nested 
>> expressions.
>>
>> Modified:
>>     
>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/collections/FlexibleMapAccessor.java
>>     
>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/collections/test/FlexibleMapAccessorTests.java
>>
>> Modified: 
>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/collections/FlexibleMapAccessor.java
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/collections/FlexibleMapAccessor.java?rev=1338361&r1=1338360&r2=1338361&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- 
>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/collections/FlexibleMapAccessor.java
>>  (original)
>> +++ 
>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/collections/FlexibleMapAccessor.java
>>  Mon May 14 19:43:18 2012
>> @@ -76,6 +76,16 @@ public class FlexibleMapAccessor<T> impl
>>          }
>>      }
>>  
>> +    /**
>> +     * Returns <code>true</code> if <code>fma</code> contains a nested 
>> expression.
>> +     * @param fma
>> +     * @return <code>true</code> if <code>fma</code> contains a nested 
>> expression
>> +     * @throws NullPointerException if <code>fma</code> is null
>> +     */
>> +    public static boolean containsNestedExpression(FlexibleMapAccessor<?> 
>> fma) {
>> +        return fma.fse != null;
>> +    }
>> +
> 
> Just make it a method on the object itself, so one can do:
> 
> fma.containsNestedExpression()

Thanks, Adrian, for changing that.

Generally, ofbiz uses static methods for lots of things, and then uses
generic objects(simple collection objects, strings, etc).  Howeverr,
in this case, we already have a custom object, doing various things,
so the feature should just be a new method on that.

Reply via email to