On 6/4/2012 6:54 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 3, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I wonder if OOTB we should not rather use GroovyUtil.runScriptAtLocation(). In
term ofdebugging executeScript() is really hard to follow. If someone wants to
implment it's own version (ie not using Groovy) then s/he could still use
executeScript()
Opinions?
Jacques
+1
Enabling Groovy specific processor will also enable the usage of debuggers; I
already mentioned this some weeks ago and Adrian agreed in temporarily enabling
Groovy specific processing.
Do whatever it takes to make the various script engines work. Ideally,
we should not need to write language-specific code, but we don't live in
an ideal world.
-Adrian
