Sorry to resurrect this old post, but what is the status on this? Thanks
Jacques From: "Scott Gray" <[email protected]> > We've had this discussion before, here is last one I could find: > http://markmail.org/message/ftvs45vnzlobo7hb > > The solution I would like to propose for the problem David described > is for us to make more use of the test-group child element of test- > suite and have tests within those groups rollback as a group, for all > other test cases we'd roll them back as soon as they complete. Here's > an example of what I'm talking about since that description probably > did nothing for you: > > <test-suite> > > <test-case/> > <!-- Rollback here --> > <test-case/> > <!-- Rollback here --> > <test-case/> > <!-- Rollback here --> > > <!-- No rollbacks inside the test group --> > <test-group> > <test-case/> > <test-case/> > </test-group> > <!-- Rollback here --> > > </test-suite> > > A common problem I'm seeing is that we want to run multiple tests on > the same piece of demo data but can't because the previous test has > already altered it. An example might be where you want to try > shipping a single order in various different splits but you can't do > that at the moment without having a separate demo order for each test. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > >
