Would you be willing to upload the patch to Jira? I could take a look
at it when I have some time.
-Adrian
Quoting Jacopo Cappellato <[email protected]>:
As a side note, we could also consider to use Atomikos as an
alternative to commons DBCP; I have actually a local patch that
replaces commons-dbcp+geronimoTx with Atomikos; it is mostly working
(except for some Tx related details on some special cases I didn't
find time to fix). This would work well on high load systems.
Jacopo
On Jan 26, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OK, It's not as simple as I thought, to be continued later...
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
I guess using the standalone version it should not be a problem
In
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/jdbc-pool.html#Standalone
they that it has only one dependency on tomcat-juli.jar.
It shoud be then simply a replacement for Common DBCP.
But I have to clarify because at
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/jdbc-pool.html#Introduction they
pretend it's a better implementation but not clearly over which
version of Common DBCP (1.4 is reputed to be quite safe)
Even here
http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2012/01/24/using-tomcat-7-jdbc-connection-pool-production
And from
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4711943/tomcat-dbcp-vs-commons-dbcp
From here it's even less clear
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/jndi-datasource-examples-howto.html#Database_Connection_Pool_(DBCP)_Configurations
And logAbandoned, removeAbandoned, removeAbandonedTimeout could
be a important reason to stay with Common DBCP
I found
http://vigilbose.blogspot.fr/2009/03/apache-commons-dbcp-and-tomcat-jdbc.html that I have not read
yet
I will digg a bit more when I will get a chance...
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[email protected]>
Hi Jacques,
I didn't study the details but wouldn't this switch prevent (or
make even more difficult) deployment of OFBiz in other
application servers?
Jacopo
On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I read <<The JDBC Connection Pool org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool is
a replacement or an alternative to the commons-dbcp connection
pool.>> at
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/jdbc-pool.html#Introduction
I did not get into feasability details yet
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/jdbc-pool.html#Standalone
Opinions?
Jacques
