I'm also for keeping the specialpurpose/ecommerce component in releases, it's 
an important part of the OFBiz brand.
I'd also like we finalize its UI, tought I have not much time/energy to put in 
it. At least 3 Jira are waiting for ages, 2 of them are important 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3037

BTW about our slim-down effort, 
In Jira I see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20SlimDown
 that issues are done (I'd not want to change the Examples components more)
What else?

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[email protected]>
> Based on the feedback from Deepak and Medhat: what if we include ecommerce 
> only?
> I mean: we remove from the 13.04 branch all the specialpurpose components 
> except the ecommerce component; we could also include the "example" 
> component, but that is probably less useful in a release. The ecommerce 
> component has been historically always present in all our releases (as it has 
> been implemented in the applications folder).
> 
> Jacopo
> 
> On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Medhat AbdelBadie <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> It is OK,
>> 
>> But Does this mean ecommerce application will be removed to another
>> directory, or will be entirely suppressed from the new release and
>> released separately?
>> Does this mean we will have main release with core components, and any
>> other components will be treated as plugins or something like that?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Medhat
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Deepak Dixit
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> One thing will need to move convertProductPriceCurrency property from
>>> ecommerce.properies file, may be place it in catalog.properties or in some
>>> other property file.
>>> As this is used for automatic product price currency conversion (r1125215).
>>> 
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> --
>>> Deepak Dixit
>>> 
>>> On Mar 23, 2013, at 2:40 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Agreed
>>>> 
>>>> Jacques
>>>> 
>>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <[email protected]>
>>>>> That seems pretty harmless. Anyone wanting to use specialpurpose can
>>>>> just add it to their local copy.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/22/2013 4:19 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> the next month is the month of the creation of our annual branch
>>> release: release13.04.
>>>>>> In preparation for this, I would like to propose to exclude from the
>>> upcoming new branch the specialpurpose folder and some of the themes
>>> components: this is inline with what we have discussed recently for the
>>> trunk (and there seemed to be a good consensus/interest about this), i.e.
>>> separating the specialpurpose folders into an optional module that is not
>>> built and deployed by default: for the trunk this requires some work to
>>> make the build scripts more flexible, but for the branch it is much simpler
>>> (we can simply remove the folders from the branch).
>>>>>> This will help a lot to avoid the risk to receive vulnerability
>>> reports for the future releases, that require a good amount of work for us;
>>> in fact there are a lot of external jars in specialpurpose and if we
>>> deliver them in our releases we should also take care of making sure that,
>>> if the external projects issue new releases with fixes for vulnerabilities
>>> then we should also issue a new release as well: maintaining this is time
>>> consuming and also reviewing all the code to make sure it meets good
>>> standard of quality and it is clear from license issues when a release is
>>> issued is becoming an overwhelming effort. If we deliver in releases a
>>> smaller codebase, everything will be easier and more manageable.
>>>>>> Of course we can still decide to issue a release of "specialpurpose"
>>> components separately.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
>

Reply via email to