[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824610#comment-13824610
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5395:
----------------------------------------
Yes I know, but still ORO is 6 times faster than Java 1.6 regex (see link
above). That's why I want to change the Java regex usage to ORO in OFBiz when
relevant and possible (ORO has not all the features of Java regex). No needs
to worry about it, it's fast and reliable. Anyway, If ever in the future we
want to move to Java regex it's not a big deal. I saw you commited
PatternFactory.java, I will have a look at the rest when I will get a chance.
> Introduce Tomcat's JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener and why
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5395
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: framework
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> Labels: JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener, ThreadLocal, leak
> Attachments: OFBIZ-5395-CompilerMatcher.patch
>
>
> After reading few articles on possible memory leaks when using ThreadLocal
> variable with custom classes in application server context where a thread
> pool is used, I checked OFBiz code. There is only 2 custom classes
> concerned: CompilerMatcher and RollbackOnlyCause (JDK classes are not
> concerned by ThreadLocal memory leaks).
> First I must tell, that the memory leak problem is more clearly described in
> those articles when you use an external Application Server (like Tomcat) and
> you deploy/undeploy applications. It seems there are no major issues when you
> use OFBiz OOTB (with Tomcat embedded). Nevertheless, it's a concern by and
> large.
> I have not investigated RollbackOnlyCause, only CompilerMatcher. But, after
> some profiling, I believe both should only generate small amouts of memory
> leaks, almost not noticeable even after several deploy/undeploy cycles.
> Nevertheless I tried to find a good way to get rid of CompilerMatcher
> possible leaks. I thought about 3 ways:
> # *Reverts [CompilerMatcher related
> changes|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1075322]* done
> for OFBIZ-4107 (introduction of CompilerMatcher) by using
> Perl5Compiler.READ_ONLY_MASK which guarantees thread safety
> ** Pros: no need to introduce ThreadLocal
> ** Cons: performance, local Perl5 variables creation removes the
> patterns-compiled-cache CompilerMatcher introduced (note: [I found the origin
> of CompilerMatcher class
> here|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jmeter-user/200212.mbox/%[email protected]%3E])
> # *Uses ThreadLocal<CompilerMatcher> local variables* instead of private
> static members
> ** Pros: no need to worry about thread safety
> ** Cons: performance, local ThreadLocal local variables creation removes the
> patterns-compiled-cache ThreadLocal<CompilerMatcher> offers when used as a
> private static member
> # *Introduces [Tomcat's
> JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener|http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/MemoryLeakProtection].*
> [What it does (in less than a
> minute)?|http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14882794/what-does-tomcats-threadlocalleakpreventionlistener-do-exactly]
> [Why JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener was
> created?|http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/04/06/tomcats-new-memory-leak-prevention-and-detection]
> [History (29 pages
> presentation).|http://people.apache.org/~markt/presentations/2010-11-04-Memory-Leaks-60mins.pdf]
> How it does it? [Read
> code!|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener.java?view=annotate]
> ** Pros:
> *** no changes related to CompilerMatcher, performance enhancement the cache
> introduces kept
> *** prevents memory leaks when an external Application Server is used or at
> least warn about them (Note: this can only be done in OFBiz internally, for
> app server the best is to document with a section in the [related wiki
> page|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/Run+OFBiz+under+outside+Application+Servers].
> ** Cons: none, this should had any noticeable effects when OFBiz is used OOTB
> (Tomcat embedded)
> I decided to go with the JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener solution. Another
> reason for that is that when I profiled OFBiz trunk using the demo site I
> found that we were having a large bloc of memory retained by
> [sun.awt.AppContext|http://www.docjar.com/docs/api/sun/awt/AppContext.html].
> I think we should not have such a thing, the web truk demo does not use AWT
> at all! Fortunately jreMemoryLeakPreventionListener.setAppContextProtection
> prevents this, even if I have still no ideas from where this comes (certainly
> something like explainded in page 14 of the link from "History (29 pages
> presentation)" above)
> I'm also considering to replace the current uses of java.util.regex.Pattern
> by CompilerMatcher in cases of a static pattern is used. When the
> CompilerMatcher cache makes sense (patterns do not change). The interest is
> the better performance of the oro framework, at least so far (Java 1.6, see
> below).
> Some interesting references I noted while analysing this issue:
> * [Oro is 6 times faster than regular Java
> regex|http://www.tusker.org/regex/regex_benchmark.html]. So, with its cache,
> CompilerMatcher is more than an interesting alternative to regular Java regex.
> * Java regex Javadoc:
> [Compiler|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html],
>
> [Matcher|https://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/regex/Matcher.html]
> * Oro Javadoc:
> [Compiler|https://jakarta.apache.org/oro/api/org/apache/oro/text/regex/Perl5Compiler.html],
>
> [Matcher|https://jakarta.apache.org/oro/api/org/apache/oro/text/regex/Perl5Matcher.html]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
