Adrian,

Is your new framework also intended to solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5458, as you outlined in your
comments there?

Regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com


On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pierre Smits <[email protected]>wrote:

> +1 on finalizing Another Framework Vision document in cwiki
> +1 on: refactoring in a new branch.
> +1 on: with the help from others
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Adrian Crum <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Some years ago we engaged in a discussion about rewriting the OFBiz
>> framework:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ofbiz-dev/201203.
>> mbox/%[email protected]%3E
>>
>> Then a suggestion was made to base OFBiz on the Moqui framework:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ofbiz-dev/201203.
>> mbox/%[email protected]%3E
>>
>> Since those discussions, progress has been made in rewriting bits and
>> pieces of the framework, but no one has tackled replacing the framework
>> entirely. I am ready to begin that effort.
>>
>> My preference would be to create a branch and start building things out
>> there - with the help of others. The goal would be to start over from
>> scratch - using sound design principles and the lessons learned from the
>> current code.
>>
>> If there is support for this effort, then I can begin working on it in
>> February. If not, then I will most likely start a separate project -
>> similar to the approach taken by Moqui.
>>
>> I created a design document:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/
>> Another+Framework+Vision
>>
>> It is in the draft stage. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
>>
>> --
>> Adrian Crum
>> Sandglass Software
>> www.sandglass-software.com
>>
>
>

Reply via email to