[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13946603#comment-13946603
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5170:
------------------------------------------
{quote}At first I replaced all FastList instances with java.util.ArrayList.
Profiling the change indicated longer AST. Then I replaced all FastList
instances with java.util.LinkedList. Profiling the change indicated a shorter
AST.{quote}
Adrian, this is interesting. However, the problem of selecting the best
implementation for a List, doesn't have one solution that is valid in all the
situations: for some usages arrays (i.e. ArrayList) are better, in some others
linked lists (i.e. LinkedList) are better.
But I agree that it makes more sense to benchmark FastList with LinkedList
rather than ArrayList because FastList is also a linked list implementation.
> Profiling OFBiz
> ---------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5170
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ALL COMPONENTS
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Adrian Crum
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HotSpotSettings.PNG, HotSpots_Rev_1464779.csv
>
>
> I will be using this issue to share the things I learn while profiling OFBiz
> to study the impact of removing Javolution.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
