I don't see how that page is related to Moqui or Hemp. I remember David
trying to rally support for a set of design documents - something OFBiz
desperately needs.
Yes, they are neglected. But from my perspective, they are essential.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1/10/2015 5:44 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I even wonder if we should not get rid of the OFBREQDES workpspace all
together
Since then David has created Moqui and Hemp. It seems to me that people
interested should rather refer to them than this now deprecated workspace.
Jacques
Le 07/01/2015 22:53, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I think we can remove this page
Jacques
Le 26/11/2014 15:12, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Open+Standards+for+OFBiz
This page appears to be old and probably in need of update.
Some of the sentences using the future tense should be changed to say
that the work proposed has been done.
It does provide an important information about the fundamental
philosophy of OFBiz.
The whole OFBiz Requirements and Designs
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES> space seems
to be neglected.
I am not sure that this Confluence space is currently being used and
perhaps the material that is still relevant could be moved to a
better place.
Some seems to belong in the end-user doc (the page referenced above
Open Standards for OFBiz
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Open+Standards+for+OFBiz>
seems to fit that as does the whole section Universal Business
Process Library Index
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBREQDES/Universal+Business+Process+Library+Index>)
Some seems to be technical docs.
I am not sure how much is useful for understanding current technical
state but perhaps some of the more knowledgeable members could sort
some of this out.
