[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326179#comment-14326179
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5569:
------------------------------------
Maybe I wasn't clear, so I will draw a picture:
{code}
InventoryItemDetail
|
|__WorkEffort (Create Widget)
|
|__ WorkEffort (Assemble Widget)
| |
| |__ Party (Assembler)
|
|__ WorkEffort (Inspect Assembly)
| |
| |__ Party (Inspector)
|
|__ WorkEffort (Rework part)
| |
| |__ Party (Assembler)
|
|__ WorkEffort (Inspect Assembly)
| |
| |__ Party (Inspector)
|
.
.
.
{code}
> Add production run task inspection capabilities using time entry improvements
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-5569
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5569
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: manufacturing
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Christian Carlow
> Assignee: Pierre Smits
>
> There doesn't seem to be a standard method for handling production run
> inspections that offer any real power in terms of reporting. The system
> already lacks time entry functionality which will be added in OFBIZ-5532.
> Once time entry functionality is added to the declaration services,
> TimeEntryAssoc could be created to link an inspection time entries to a
> manufacturing work time entries to represent an inspection of manufacturing
> work. The goal is to be able to determine the number of bad pieces produced
> per manufacturing worker and who was the inspector. The functionality should
> also be flexible and powerful enough to distinguish who is actually at fault
> for the bad piece. In most cases, the manufacturing workers will be at
> fault, but there could be times where an inspector might accidentally drop a
> good or potentially good piece and the system should be able to flag them as
> the party actually responsible for the defect.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
