Yes, I answered to Ron about "searching for modules in Maven Central a bit more sensible." But this means to use Maven to me, else I still don't see
the reason
Jacques
Le 29/04/2015 15:12, Pierre Smits a écrit :
For sure nobody wants to alienate the users.
But it also about getting in line with the policies of the ASF, e.g.
branding. Given that we are considering a lot of impacting changes in the
near future (see other threads), the opportunity to rename the artefacts
becomes evident when these intended changes are upon us.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
Le 27/04/2015 13:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I agree with Adam moreover I don't see a real need to rename packages and
what it would add to the project apart more efforts and confusion. So like
Adam
Mmm, I was not clear, of course for the project it would be cool. I was
more thinking about the project users, our beloved users.... We should not
mistreat them when we can avoid... I see no plus in renaming packages!
Jacques
-1, even in the long term on my side, I'm not mad about having ALL
"clean"!
Jacques
Le 22/04/2015 17:13, Adam Heath a écrit :
-1, but not permanently.
If we start renaming things, then it'll become hard to port changes back
and forth between release branches and trunk. We need to reduce the number
of outstanding branches first, before this can even be started.
On 04/22/2015 10:09 AM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
I was thinking of something like an 8 hour sprint where several people
divide up the task and do it and test it quickly.
divide up by application, code/XML, seed data, documentation, testing
and what ever makes sense to get the change done in a few hours.
Ron
On 22/04/2015 5:01 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Ron,
Notwithstanding the appropriateness of the elements in your response,
everything done in the OFBiz project IS a community project (endeavour
for
a better word).
Thank you for reiterating the invite for more collaboration. I
wholeheartedly agree and support.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Ron Wheeler <
[email protected]> wrote:
Definitely a good idea.
Should it be done as a community project over a short period of time?
It would seem to be easier to do as a sort of global "search and
replace"
followed by testing rather than modifying a piece and looking for all
of
the references to that code and changing them and testing and then
picking
the next piece.
Adding a JIRA sounds like the best start.
Ron
On 22/04/2015 4:36 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi all,
In this posting http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/mjlm5dvimcjngr6k
Adrian
proposed to rename our OFBiz artefacts from "org.ofbiz" to
"org.apache.ofbiz" to bring it more inline to conventions used by
other
Apache projects/products.
Does this proposal need any further discussion? Or can we move
forward by
creating a JIRA and work from there?
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: [email protected]
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
