+1 On Aug 14, 2016 3:29 PM, "Mridul Pathak" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Taher, > > Yes, I was talking about splitting those and implement as it’s own method > rather than using the common approach for both. > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Mridul Pathak > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > On Aug 12, 2016, at 7:49 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Mridul, > > > > I'm assuming you want to split the methods, not copy-paste into a new > file right? If yes then yeah I think It's a good idea. > > > > Taher Alkhateeb > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Mridul Pathak < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > The other area that I believe needs be fixed is the use of > UtilProperties for both configurations and UI Labels. UI Labels used to be > in properties files way back and at that time when migrating to XML format > it made sense to keep using the same methods for properties and UI Labels > to minimize the effort. I think handling of configurations versus UI Labels > can be redesigned to be distinct functionalities. > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Mridul Pathak > > Senior Manager > > HotWax Systems > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> > > > > > On Aug 8, 2016, at 10:56 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > However as far as configuration files are concerned, I find the whole > > > approach currently used in OFBiz a bit confusing and problematic. > There are > > > too many files scattered in too many places. Some of them are XML and > some > > > are .properties. we should really have one or a few files preferrably > in > > > one directory for all configurations related to framework and core > > > applications. Or maybe just one master configuration file for > framework and > > > another one for applications and that's it. Also many configurations > should > > > be code and vice versa. All of this makes tweking OFBiz confusing and > > > difficult. > > > > > > So my real preference is to shake things up, redesign and centralize > > > configurations for OFBiz. For example if you think of apache httpd, > then > > > it's really one or two major files isn't it? It should be similar with > us I > > > think. > > > > > >
