There was a bit that I missed - and this is a common thing that keeps coming back up when we get together and talk:
OFBiz could deliver more than one product. We could have more than one product active at the same time e.g - Framework with applications - Advanced UI but without all features - Advanced features but with the poor UI This is also something that we could think about for the high level strategy. Thanks Sharan On 2016-11-28 11:08 (+0100), "Sharan Foga"<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Everyone > > One of the topics that came up during the brainstorming in Seville was that > the project desperately needs a clear strategy and roadmap. > > Benefits: > - A strategy will provide a clear path for people to follow > - A strategy will allow us to set goals / milestones and metrics about > progress > > In past maybe we have tried to do too much (tried to do it all at once - > which is why we find it h ard to focus). > > - One suggestion was to set a maximum of 3 goals and then work only on these. > To define these goals we need to look at what is the most important thing > that we want to achieve - and base them on that. > - Another suggestion was that the most important thing for the project is > driving adoption. If this is true then what are the key blockers that stop > user adoption of OFBiz? (the UI!)Â > - Suggestion to organise / setup teams from the community that focus on > specific areas (e.g. workgroups) - this could really help progress > > So to get the discussion started: > > 1. Do people agree that the project needs to focus on driving adoption? > 2. Do people think that the UI is one of the key things that stops this ? > (If, not then please include what do you think is) > 3. What goals could we set? > 4. Are people interested in working in workgroups, to focus on specific areas > (or goals)? > > (I know there are some ideas/work around the UI going on, but I will post the > Seville details and notes about that in separate discussion thread.) > > Thanks > Sharan > >
