Le 29/03/2017 à 13:53, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
Mmm, maybe I was not totally clear if you did not read my answer to Taher.
I meant to remove the useless try and catch. We have 70+ other cases like
that w/o try and catch
I would recommend to revert your commit and start a new thread to discuss
this new task.
Jacopo
But seriously, why? It is not clear enough already? How this case is different
from the other 70+?
Jacques
