Yup, good catch. Naturally, the second one should be removed. I'll take care of it.
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Jacques Le Roux < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Taher, > > <PartyStatus partyId="DemoCustCompany" statusId="PARTY_ENABLED" > statusDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00.0"/> > > is duplicated below, not sure which one to remove because of possible > dependecies > > Jacques > > > Le 27/04/2017 à 13:39, [email protected] a écrit : > >> Author: taher >> Date: Thu Apr 27 11:39:04 2017 >> New Revision: 1792866 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1792866&view=rev >> Log: >> Implemented: Removed most dependencies from OFBiz framework to plugins >> (OFBIZ-9322) >> > [...] > > + <!-- DemoCustCompany --> >> + <Party partyId="DemoCustCompany" partyTypeId="PARTY_GROUP" >> statusId="PARTY_ENABLED"/> >> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoCustCompany" roleTypeId="ACCOUNT"/> >> + <PartyStatus partyId="DemoCustCompany" statusId="PARTY_ENABLED" >> statusDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00.0"/> >> + <PartyGroup partyId="DemoCustCompany" groupName="Demo Customer >> Company"/> >> + <UserLogin partyId="DemoCustCompany" userLoginId="DemoCustCompany"/> >> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoCustCompany" roleTypeId="CUSTOMER"/> >> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoCustCompany" roleTypeId="BILL_TO_CUSTOMER"/> >> + <PartyRole partyId="DemoCustCompany" roleTypeId="_NA_"/> >> + <PartyStatus partyId="DemoCustCompany" statusId="PARTY_ENABLED" >> statusDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00.0"/> >> > >
