Hello Taher,

I would like to work on to provide patches for this effort.

Thanks & Regards,
Devanshu Vyas.

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <
slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you all for your feedback and votes. I just counted 12 positive
> votes to go ahead.
>
> I have created a JIRA [1] for this task and I will work on it, but it
> would be fantastic if someone is willing to take the lead on this so
> that I can focus on refactoring the rest of the core framework. Also
> any volunteers to commit or provide patches are more than welcomed.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9501
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 14/07/2017 à 11:59, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
> >>
> >>   Hello Everyone,
> >>
> >> Data loading in OFBiz is quite fragile. A small change could crash the
> >> system and finding out the reason can be difficult. I really felt the
> >> pain of this when trying to disentangle the framework from data
> >> dependencies on plugins [1].
> >>
> >> I've been thinking about a solution to reduce fragility, and here are
> >> my thoughts:
> >> - The less data files the better.
> >> - The less data the better.
> >> - The less distance (e.g. same directory) between data files the better.
> >> - No circular dependencies (file dependencies should be like a tree).
> >> - Fail fast [2].
> >>
> >> Therefore, I suggest the following action points:
> >> - Create a directory structure similar to [3] in the datamodel
> component.
> >> - For any data that two or more files depend on, immediately move it
> >> to the common-<reader>.xml file.
> >> - For any data that does not belong to any domain (e.g. marketing,
> >> content, etc ..) move it to the common-<reader>.xml.
> >> - Maintain a strict dependency hierarchy of demo -> seed ->
> seed-initial.
> >> - Gradually and carefully move data from all applications to the
> >> datamodel component as per above guidelines.
> >> - Cleanup and refactor the data as we move it including any tests that
> >> depend on it.
> >>
> >> What do you think of this proposal? Does it sound reasonable? Also
> >> given the size of what I'm proposing I think we need multiple people
> >> to work on this. So is anyone interested in taking part in this
> >> initiative?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Taher Alkhateeb
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9322
> >> [2]
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a18b5d4086a07ff34a0cb950999e8f
> 8e869a6aa7efa2fc866a75a7b6@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E
> >> [3] directory structure:
> >> data/
> >> ├── demo
> >> │   ├── accounting-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── common-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── content-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── humanres-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── manufacturing-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── marketing-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── order-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── party-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── product-demo.xml
> >> │   ├── shipment-demo.xml
> >> │   └── workeffort-demo.xml
> >> ├── seed
> >> │   ├── accounting-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── common-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── content-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── humanres-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── manufacturing-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── marketing-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── order-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── party-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── product-seed.xml
> >> │   ├── shipment-seed.xml
> >> │   └── workeffort-seed.xml
> >> └── seed-initial
> >>      ├── accounting-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── common-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── content-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── humanres-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── manufacturing-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── marketing-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── order-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── party-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── product-seed-initial.xml
> >>      ├── shipment-seed-initial.xml
> >>      └── workeffort-seed-initial.xml
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to