Hi,

1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes :)

As for getFunctionFQN: I needed this method during the metadata serialization 
since I do not have any parameters and thus could not call the method. So for 
now I would leave it there. Overloading is based on Parameters while the name 
stays the same.

Best Regards,
Christian

-----Original Message-----
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] 
Sent: Montag, 7. April 2014 11:36
To: dev@olingo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] EdmEntityContainer: getActionImport(String) / 
getFunctionImport(String)

Hi,
as suggested by Ralf, since "Unbound actions currently cannot have 
overloads", I will perform the following changes:

1. in EdmActionImport

REMOVE getBoundAction(...)

2. in EdmFunctionImport

REMOVE getBoundFunction(...)

ADD List<EdmFunction> getUnboundFunctions()


OLINGO-202 description says instead "Introduce the getActions and 
getFunctions method which will deliver all UNBOUND actions and functions 
with the specified name" which would suggest to also

ADD List<EdmAction> getUnboundActions()

in EdmActionImport


Correct?

What about EdmFunctionImport's

FullQualifiedName getFunctionFqn()

?

Regards.

On 07/04/2014 10:43, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 07/04/2014 10:34, Amend, Christian wrote:
>> Yes this is ok for me.
>>
>> Why don`t you open a new branch make the interfaces and client side 
>> and I will then look at the server side.
>> You can use this Jira issue as a reference: 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-202
>
> Fine; I have also linked OLINGO-234 to OLINGO-202.
>
> Regards.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Montag, 7. April 2014 10:31
>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] EdmEntityContainer: getActionImport(String) / 
>> getFunctionImport(String)
>>
>> On 07/04/2014 10:28, Amend, Christian wrote:
>>> Hi Ralf,
>>>
>>> thank you very much for the clarification!
>>>
>>> @ Francesco:
>>> This means for us:
>>> 1. Delete the get boundFunction and getBoundAction method.
>>> 2. Maybe introduce a getActions method which delivers all unbound 
>>> Actions for this this name. Same goes fur Functions.
>> I can do both things straight away, if this is fine for you (I would
>> possibly need some guidance for server-side implementation).
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Handl, Ralf [mailto:ralf.ha...@sap.com]
>>> Sent: Montag, 7. April 2014 10:24
>>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] EdmEntityContainer: getActionImport(String) / 
>>> getFunctionImport(String)
>>>
>>> Hi Christian and Francesco,
>>>
>>> There's no way to import a single function overload, the 
>>> FunctionImport element imports all overloads into the entity 
>>> container. It also only allows importing unbound function overloads, 
>>> see 
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/os/part3-csdl/odata-v4.0-os-part3-csdl.html#_Toc372794000.
>>>
>>> The ActionImport element also only imports an unbound action. 
>>> Unbound actions currently cannot have overloads, because overloads 
>>> must have the same binding parameter, and unbound actions don't have 
>>> one, see 
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/os/part3-csdl/odata-v4.0-os-part3-csdl.html#_Toc372793963.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> --Ralf
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Amend, Christian [mailto:christian.am...@sap.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, 7. April 2014 10:13
>>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
>>> Subject: FW: [DISCUSS] EdmEntityContainer: getActionImport(String) / 
>>> getFunctionImport(String)
>>>
>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>
>>> I have forwarded this message to the dev list :)
>>>
>>> ActionImports and FunctionImports have an operation specified by 
>>> FullQualified Name. The Overloading happens based on Parameters when 
>>> they are called. So giving back a list of ActionImports would not 
>>> make sense but rather adding a method at the ActionImport like this 
>>> List<EdmAction> getActions(). This way a client can decide which 
>>> Action he wants to invoke. Same goes for FunctionImport.
>>>
>>> As far as I know there is no way to bind a single Action directly to 
>>> an ActionImport again same goes for Functions and FunctionImports.
>>>
>>> As for the methods getBoundAction/getUnbound at the ActionImport I 
>>> have to look into this. As far as I know only unbound Actions can 
>>> serve for an Action Import. I don`t know who introduced this 
>>> methods. For Functions I will have to look into this as well.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Montag, 7. April 2014 09:42
>>> To: d...@olingo.incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] EdmEntityContainer: getActionImport(String) / 
>>> getFunctionImport(String)
>>>
>>> On 07/04/2014 09:24, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> as part of OLINGO-234 I am now considering some scenarios where action
>>>> and / or functions are overloaded.
>>>>
>>>> I have just noticed that the EdmEntityContainer container has the
>>>> following two methods:
>>>>
>>>>     EdmActionImport getActionImport(String name);
>>>>     EdmFunctionImport getFunctionImport(String name);
>>>>
>>>> I would have expected, though, something like as
>>>>
>>>>     List<EdmActionImport> getActionImport(String name);
>>>>     List<EdmFunctionImport> getFunctionImport(String name);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am I wrong?
>>> I have also just noticed that both EdmActionImport and 
>>> EdmFunctionImport
>>> have methods like as getUnboundFunction() / getUnboundAction() -
>>> getBoundFunction() / getBoundAction() (they actually used to have plain
>>> getAction() / getFunction()): this suggests that from a single
>>> ActionImport / FunctionImport one can get to all actions / functions
>>> with given name.
>>>
>>> Isn't there a way to bound an ActionImport / FunctionImport to a single
>>> Action / Function?

-- 
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to