[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14635042#comment-14635042
]
Michael Bolz commented on OLINGO-735:
-------------------------------------
Hi [~gmurray],
I agree with you that the use of {{reflectionEquals}} is not the best solution
especially for {{ClientItem}} and {{FQN}}.
We will replace the usage of {{reflectionEquals}} with an according
implementation of both methods before the stable release.
Best regards,
Michael
> reflectionEquals in ClientItem and FullQualifiedName make for unacceptable
> parsing performance.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OLINGO-735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-735
> Project: Olingo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: odata4-client, odata4-commons
> Affects Versions: (Java) V4 4.0.0-beta-03
> Reporter: Graham Murray
> Assignee: Michael Bolz
> Fix For: (Java) V4 4.0.0
>
>
> Reviewing a CPU profiling result of a simple OData parse points out any use
> of reflectionEquals as demolishing the parse performance. It doesn't even
> seem like reflectionEquals is needed for ClientItem or FullQualifiedName,
> shouldn't they just be implemented properly?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
