Also a “+1” from my side,
as long as the integration with current Apache Git works flawless   ;o)

Best Regards,
Michael


> On 14 Dec 2015, at 17:54, V.A, Chandan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 from me.
> Initially we also were able to update the JIRA ticket ID automatically upon 
> committing to apache repo. This was possible if we include JIRA ticket ID 
> like [OLINGO-XXX] in the commit message. But suddenly it stopped working. 
> Maybe we need to bring that feature as well back.
> 
> Regards
> Chandan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramesh Reddy [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 7:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] GitHub setup for Olingo
> 
> +1 anything that improves workflow with GitHub is good news. Ability to look 
> up commits based on JIRA is very valuable. And the emails will serve as code 
> review invitations, which is great.
> 
> Ramesh.. 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 14/12/2015 14:52, Amend, Christian wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> It seems that the integration between Apache and GitHub is far more
>>> advanced than I realized. According to this blog entry[1] one only has to
>>> open a ticket with Infrastructure to get this enabled. These are some of
>>> the features that can be enabled:
>>> Any Pull Request that gets opened, closed, reopened or commented on now
>>> gets recorded on the project's mailing list
>>> If a project has a JIRA instance, any PRs or comments on PRs that include a
>>> JIRA ticket ID will trigger an update on that specific ticket
>>> Replying to a GitHub comment on the dev@ mailing list will trigger a
>>> comment being placed on GitHub (yes, it works both ways!)
>>> 
>>> As far as I understood you still can`t use it as a primary repository.
>>> Instead all changes are made at the Apache repo and once they are
>>> replicated to GitHub they trigger the closing of a pull request there
>>> automatically. This also means that the fancy UI features of GitHub for
>>> merging can`t be used (please correct me here if I am wrong)
>>> 
>>> What do you think about this? I personally would like to have a better
>>> integration with GitHub. This should enable people to easier contribute to
>>> Olingo.
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>>> @ Francesco: You said you are using this for Syncope. Which features have
>>> you enabled there and does it mean much overhead to work with it? And most
>>> importantly is it enough to open a ticket with infrastructure or are there
>>> additional steps needed to make this work?
>> 
>> At Syncope we have enabled everything available :-)
>> 
>> No overhead, AFAICT, and the only fancy think you actually miss is the
>> "Merge" button - which needs to be replaced by a commit with log "This
>> closes #X".
>> 
>> In my own experience, a ticket to Infra does the job usually; sometimes
>> a quick visit on
>> 
>> https://s.apache.org/infrachat
>> 
>> and some kindness help as well :-)
>> 
>> Regards.
>> 
>>> [1]
>>> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
>> 
>> --
>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> 
>> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
>> http://www.tirasa.net/
>> 
>> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
>> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, CXF committer
>> http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>> 
>> 
>> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to