+1 For the moment I think this is fine. Do you think we can go with the latest and greatest version of eclipselink in future?
Stephan On 05.11.13 14:34, "V.A, Chandan" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hello All >In order to fix the build failure that is arising due to missing eclipse >link jar:2.3.1 in central maven, I would like to add the following >section to parent pom.xml > ><repositories> ><repository> <!-- not just for eclipse link but in general --> > <id>oss.sonatype.org</id> > <name>OSS Sonatype Staging</name> > <url>https://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/staging</url> ></repository> ><repository> <!-For Eclipse Link prior to 2.4.2 --> > <id>EclipseLink</id> > <url>http://download.eclipse.org/rt/eclipselink/maven.repo</url> ></repository> ></repositories> > >As explained in section "Repositories" - >http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Maven > >Is this fine? > >Thanks, >Kind Regards >Chandan VA >
