[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13838951#comment-13838951
]
Michael Bolz commented on OLINGO-32:
------------------------------------
Hi Chandan,
for me {{ZERO_OR_ONE}} sounds better. In addition I took a look into OData
specification which only defines {{0..1}}.
So I think it's ok to rename it.
The OSGi enabling will I do when I rename the sub module. Do you think
{{odata-annotation-processor}} as module name is reasonable?
If all works well I start the merge in the master this week.
Kind regards,
Michael
> Introduce (Java) Annotations for definition of EDM
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OLINGO-32
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-32
> Project: Olingo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: V2 1.1.0
> Reporter: Michael Bolz
> Assignee: Michael Bolz
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: V2 1.1.0
>
>
> The idea is to create your model as POJOs which then can be annotated with
> special {{@EdmXXX}} (Java) annotations to define the EDM for an OData Service.
> Based on these annotation then the {{edmx}} document ({{$metadata}}) can be
> generated as well as a generic {{Processor}} ({{ODataSingleProcessor}}) for
> e.g. {{JSON}} can be written.
> As initial contribution and starting point for discussions about this feature
> a branch with name {{PocEdmAnnotationsExtension}} is created with a basic
> Proof of Concept.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
