[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13855429#comment-13855429
]
Michael Bolz commented on OLINGO-83:
------------------------------------
Hi [~chandan.v.a],
In my opinion and from consistency reasons we should rename the packages in the
{{jpa-processor}} module.
But because of downward compatibility we should really think about it.
Normally just a package renaming does not result in a big impact for users of
the {{jpa-processor}} module, because they only have to fix their imports
(which is with an modern IDE mostly just an _fix imports_).
I suggest to ask this question on the developers mailing list and see what
others mean or if they have another idea.
Kind regards,
Michael
> Annotation processor refactoring
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: OLINGO-83
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-83
> Project: Olingo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: odata2-annotation
> Reporter: Stephan Klevenz
> Assignee: Michael Bolz
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: V2 1.1.0
>
>
> Package naming of annotation processor are not clear and need to be
> discussed. In detail:
> - package names of core and api
> - check consistency with JPA processor
> - artifact naming
> - code review recommended
> - naming and structure of ref scenario (lib + web)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
