On 14/02/14 10:22, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
>On 14/02/2014 06:29, Bolz, Michael wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> see also my replies inline and to all not replied: +1 ;o) >>. . . >>We also experimented with Jackson for JSON parsing and it is really fast. >> But we used the streaming / event based approach from the Jackson >>library which seems faster then the annotation based. >> So I agree with using the Jackson library in general ;o) >> Probably we can also use JSR-353 (Java API for JSON Processing) in >>combination with Jackson. >> So we will be flexible which implementation is used at the end. > >Guess you are referring to [1]: it seems really interesting. Yes, I experimented with [1] it was working well. But I also experimented with a self written small wrapper to use Jackson with JSR-353 because I did not find any licence information at [1]. Worked well too ;o) Kind regards Michael > >Regards. > >[1] https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-jsr353 > >-- >Francesco Chicchiriccò > >Tirasa - Open Source Excellence >http://www.tirasa.net/ > >Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: >member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PPMC >http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
