Hi all, More than 72h have passed, Antonio agreed and no objections have been shown, I am going ahead and I'll update the artifactId according to the proposed convention.
Best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 21, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi Antonio! >> >>>> >>>> * artifactId: I would like to move artifactId to OSGi-alike taxonomy, >>>> it makes much more clear what they contain IMHO. >>> >>> may you provide an example of such ? >> >> sure! rather than having oltu-oauth2-authzserver, my proposal is >> having the groupId in the form org.apache.oltu.oauth2.authzserver. > > cool +1 then > >> >> WDYT? >> best, >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >
