That's really an interesting option, I like it! Sounds like a Simple JSON Facade 4 Java :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe better will be if you will create adapter interface and everybody > will be able to use favorite JSON library? :-) > > Cheers, > Łukasz Dywicki > -- > [email protected] > Twitter: ldywicki > Blog: http://dywicki.pl > Code-House - http://code-house.org > > Wiadomość napisana przez Stein Welberg <[email protected]> w dniu 19 wrz > 2013, o godz. 10:44: > > > My Personal favor goes to jackson but org.json will also do :-) > > > > Regards, > > Stein > > > > > > On 19 sep. 2013, at 08:54, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Simo, > >> > >> org.json would be fine (and Jackson would be good as well) so no > objection > >> on my side as I suspect that will also grant better performance. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Tommaso > >> > >> > >> 2013/9/18 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Hi all guys, > >>> > >>> I would like to discuss with you all about replacing jettison with > >>> org.json. > >>> > >>> The big advantage I see is reading/writing JSON data without generating > >>> intermediary DOM structures, this is really useful since we manipulate > our > >>> entities. > >>> > >>> WDYT? Any objection? > >>> > >>> TIA, all the best! > >>> -Simo > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >>> > > > >
