[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807108#comment-16807108
]
Andrew Purtell edited comment on OMID-139 at 4/1/19 7:37 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe [~stack] would know [~lhofhansl]. My educated guess is autoflush was
left out of Table by a deliberate choice. All the details of the new interfaces
in 1.0 were considered during the run up to 1.0. We can add new methods to
interfaces in minors so if you'd like to see this added to the interface, it
can still be done in time for 1.5.0, and 2.3.0, and 3.0.0 if done in the next
day or two. (I'm trying to get out the next 1.5 RC, but am also holding it for
HBASE-22114.)
was (Author: apurtell):
Maybe [~stack] would know [~lhofhansl]. My educated guess is autoflush was
left out of Table by a deliberate choice. All the details of the new interfaces
in 1.0 were considered during the run up to 1.0. We can add new methods to
interfaces in minors so if you'd like to see this added to the interface, it
can still be done in time for 1.5, and 2.3, and 3.0 if done in the next day or
two. (I'm trying to get out the next 1.5 RC, but am also holding it for
HBASE-22114.)
> Rollback is extremely slow
> --------------------------
>
> Key: OMID-139
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-139
> Project: Apache Omid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: 138_139.patch
>
>
> Almost 3 minutes for about 100k rows.
> Haven't debugged it, yet, but it is possible that this is not batching the
> cleanup and doing individual RPCs?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
