[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16809318#comment-16809318
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on OMID-142 at 4/3/19 11:53 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Here's a totally untested patch that deals with family delete markers. (please
note that the details are more tricky, even in the other delete cases, since
Delete Markers can carry a timestamp)
Update: I think we have no timestamp issues, since the timestamps are solely
assigned by Omid.
was (Author: lhofhansl):
Here's a totally untested patch that deals with family delete markers. (please
note that the details are more tricky, even in the other delete cases, since
Delete Markers can carry a timestamp)
> Omid GC fails in Phoenix does not remove all data
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OMID-142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-142
> Project: Apache Omid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Yonatan Gottesman
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: 142-test.txt
>
>
> When you insert a bunch of data into a table, followed by a DELETE FROM
> <table>, then flush and compact the table in HBase, the data is not removed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
