The license is already Apache License 2.0.
Sining the ICLA is the smallest of my concerns.
So I don't think this would be a problem.


On 06/04/2013 03:59 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
It looks pretty cool.

You would have to sign an ICLA:
www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
and the license would need to change to Apache License 2.0.




On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Stephan Classen <st.clas...@gmx.ch> wrote:
Hi everybody

My name is Stephan. I recently wrote an unofficial Guice extension [1] for
persistence supporting easy integration of JSR-317 (JPA 2.0) and JSR-907
(JTA) using Guice.

Guice brings its own official persistence extension guice-persist. I decided
to write (yet) another persistence extension because guice-persist misses
the following:
  - support for multiple persistence units (has to be done manually by
wrapping multiple persistence modules in private modules).
  - support for container managed persistence units.
  - support for distributed transactions (JSR-907 - JTA).

I was recently contacted by Simo if I would be willing to participate in the
Onami project.
If you think Onami could use a persistence extension I would be willing to
donate the current source and (some of) my spare time to the Onami project.

Let me know what you think.
Regards Stephan

[1] https://github.com/sclassen/guice-jpa/wiki



Reply via email to