yes, autobind is a component that I haven't touched yet - feel free to play with it if you have some spare time!
TIA! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Simone Tripodi > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am honestly for keeping the onami- prefix, the reason is that >> groupId is just metadata, artifactId is also the name that will be >> assigned to the produced artifact - once on the filesystem, while >> `autobind` would be self-explanatory, `logging` would be a little >> confusing :P > > OK makes sense. Then lets use the prefix for all components from now on? > >> >> Thanks! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Autobind: >>> >>> <artifactId>autobind-parent</artifactId> >>> >>> Loggin: >>> >>> <artifactId>onami-logging-log4j</artifactId> >>> <artifactId>onami-logging-parent</artifactId> >>> >>> Can we agree on either prefixing everything with onami or with >>> removing the prefix for every component? >>> >>> As there is a groupId containing org.apache.onami I would prefer >>> removing the prefix >>> >>> Any objections? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Christian >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> https://www.timeandbill.de > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de
