+1 it looks good to me On Dec 8, 2012 11:44 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > agreed :) > > > > I am not aware if, when releasing a parent, the lazy consensus is > > valid or we have to pass the IPMC vote as well. > > > > Mentors? > > > > > I think we need IPMC votes for every release. It should be no problem since > Oliviers and my vote are already IPMC votes. We just need a single one > more, and since parent is pretty small... > > Cheers > > > > TIA, all the best, > > -Simo > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Christian Grobmeier > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > release early, release often. > > > And with the first release of parent, we can get rid of the aggregator > > and > > > the relative statements. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Christian > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Simone Tripodi < > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all guys, > > >> > > >> is there anything else you want to discuss about the parent before > > >> releasing the first version? > > >> > > >> It looks like clean/complete ATM, but nothing prevents to release new > > >> versions while working toward components releases... > > >> > > >> WDYT? > > >> TIA! > > >> -Simo > > >> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > >> http://www.99soft.org/ > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.grobmeier.de > > > https://www.timeandbill.de > > > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de >
