2012/12/8 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>: > Hi all guys, > > I had a second thought on that and, while studying new topics at work, > I changed my mind... I don't know what is your position about but - > maybe Daniel agrees with me :P - but I'd propose a different way to > rename artifactIds, a la OSGi, as shown below... > > WDYT? do you have any opinion/objection?
-0 Perso I found this naming very redundant with the groupId. But I won't complain too much if you really want that :-) BTW if using osgi conventions (not sure it's a convention or usage or something else) we must: * change version scheme * generate correct MANIFEST.MF > Many thanks in advance! > -Simo > > onami-parent -> org.apache.onami.parent > > onami-autobind-parent -> org.apache.onami.autobind.parent > onami-autobind-aop -> org.apache.onami.autobind.aop > onami-autobind-core -> org.apache.onami.autobind.core > onami-scanner-parent -> org.apache.onami.autobind.scanner.parent > onami-scanner-asm -> org.apache.onami.autobind.scanner.asm > onami-autobind-configuration -> org.apache.onami.autobind.configuration > onami-autobind-tests -> org.apache.onami.autobind.test > > onami-cache -> org.apache.onami.cache > > onami-configuration -> org.apache.onami.configuration > > onami-guava -> org.apache.onami.guava > > onami-lifecycle -> org.apache.onami.lifecycle > > onami-logging-parent -> org.apache.onami.logging.parent > onami-logging-acl -> org.apache.onami.logging.acl > onami-logging-core -> org.apache.onami.logging.core > onami-logging-juli -> org.apache.onami.logging.juli > onami-logging-log4j -> org.apache.onami.logging.log4j > onami-logging-log4j2 -> org.apache.onami.logging.log4j2 > onami-logging-slf4j -> org.apache.onami.logging.slf4j > onami-logging-testfw -> org.apache.onami.logging.testfw > > onami-scheduler -> org.apache.onami.scheduler > > onami-spi -> org.apache.onami.spi > > onami-test -> org.apache.onami.test > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Christian Grobmeier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Autobind: >> >> <artifactId>autobind-parent</artifactId> >> >> Loggin: >> >> <artifactId>onami-logging-log4j</artifactId> >> <artifactId>onami-logging-parent</artifactId> >> >> Can we agree on either prefixing everything with onami or with >> removing the prefix for every component? >> >> As there is a groupId containing org.apache.onami I would prefer >> removing the prefix >> >> Any objections? >> >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
